Jargon: is it always bad?

Plain English is one of the foundations of good web writing, and that means death to jargon. Of course, we’ve all heard the stories about cleanliness engineers, holistic governance  and — my personal favourite — predictors of beaconicity (no, I don’t know what it means either). The current crop of Hiscox ads (“It’s a spade, not an earth relocating implement”) make great play of the company’s ability to tell it like it is.

In our experience, apart from product managers, no one ever complains that things are being made too simple. However, you could argue that jargon has a function other than to obscure the facts or make people feel that what they do is very important.

Jargon makes people feel they belong. When they discover a choice phrase like “sum insured” they think they’re in the right place. But while they may believe the presence of jargon means the writer has an in-depth understanding of their industry, the opposite is likely to be true. It’s easy to hide behind jargon when you haven’t a clue what you’re talking about.

However, sometimes there is a difference between jargon and specialised language – words for things that are only used in a very specific context. Where would we be without our H1s, standfirsts, CTAs, break-out quotes and anchor text, for example? Is our jargon OK while no-one else’s is? Answers in the designated online communications area below, please.

Share this:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon

One Response to “Jargon: is it always bad?”

  1. As always, I think it depends on your audience and your communication objectives.

    I wage a permanent war against jargon when I’m editing web content, it’s mostly unnecessary and gets in the way of the message. It’s also usually a symptom that the writer hasn’t thought of principles like brevity and readability. It’s very rarely user-centric.

    As you say though, in certain situations there’s no other word for a thing! The specific jargon word could also be what expert readers (and search engines) are looking for. In those cases I would be tempted to allow the jargon, and provide an in-text explanation if I’m expecting or targeting any lay readers.

Leave a Reply